Today, almost all of your company’s business decisions are considered profitable in most companies. Funding for various projects is heavily considered and supported by top management for certain things. May not show immediate profits, it may be difficult.
This is one reason that the framers of ISO 14000 sets of environmental management system standards and guidelines have worked to ensure that documents will reduce additional economic burden in The company, however, charges you for using ISO 14001 EMS – the main standard in the series and only one that has validated requirements of your company. The complexity of the existing EMS components, whether you have a management system such as ISO 9000 built and you have set limits that are appropriate to the scope of use or not.
You can reduce operating costs and maximize the benefits both immediately and in the long run by reviewing your starting position in the environment or analyzing gaps as specified by experts. In fact, in the appendix that provides information on the ISO 14001 standard, it is strongly suggested that if you do not have an existing EMS, With the official requirements of ISO 14001. The review should aim to consider all environmental issues of your organization as a basis for establishing an environmental management system.
If you have an EMS operating system, you do not need to do such checks in the appendix. However, experts recommend that you analyze all gaps that meet ISO 14001 requirements to identify missing or weak components. These experts agree that the assessment must provide sufficient information for your company so that you can set clear action plans, including human and financial resource allocation.
Initial assessment or gap analysis will help you know if ISO 14001 is the standard that suits your company’s needs and requirements.
Understanding the difference between initial evaluation and gap analysis may be the difference between “Are you going to jail?” Cornelius “Bud” Smith, Director of Environmental Management Services for Strategy ML and Chairman of the Technical Advisory Board of the United States
I recommend that any company that considers the initial assessment done under the rights of the client, the lawyer, “Smith said.” The company may have problems with compliance and find that they do not follow the letter of the law and no one wants. Information that will wind up in the wrong hands.
Tools and Tips:
There are many tools developed to help you perform initial assessments or gap analysis and should be available early or mid-1996. NSF International Is developing a checklist to help the company determine the scope of response to the requirements of the ISO 14001 standard.
Bureau Veritas North America ML Strategy and ERM Rocky Mountain are one of the US management consulting organizations that develop gap analysis criteria. In addition, the German delegation that helped write the ISO 14000 standard is developing a standard draft.
TAG USA has an ad hoc working group that develops ISO 14001 audit documentation for internal or external use to determine the status of your EMS. These work documents may become an index of ISO 14011/1, which is a standardized audit procedure in the ISO 14000 series.
Perhaps one of the most useful tools is ISO 14004, an environmental management guidelines document that is full of principles and step-by-step instructions on using the EMS, but not necessarily ISO 14001. This document should not be interpreted as cover only as an example. In addition, many private organizations also have manuals for writing manuals and texts on operations.
